It seems like one of the cool things to do is to have multiple sites – multiple blogs, multiple photo albums (flickr, picasaweb, etc.)… just all things to all people. Why can’t there be one site that functions as the one site for a person and their identity? What is the requirement to need to set yourself up on multiple sites?

Is it because of the passing fads of social networks? At one time, everyone flocked to MySpace. Now it’s Virb and/or Twitter. Twitter will be a dead fad by the end of the year maybe – what will be the next fad?

Discuss.

2 Comments on Multiple sites

  1. Jennifer says:

    Weird.

    I debated setting up a second blog – but as a sort of “mirror” of the first. I like the more social aspect of my vox blog, but I’m limited to what I can add to the sidebar, and right now only voxers can comment, though joining vox is free.

    I could set up a wordpress blog, and send each post to both blogs. There are plugins for this.

    But then I decided that was just too much work.

    I can’t imagine the effort involved in updating and maintaining multiple blogs.

  2. Jennifer says:

    Oh, there IS one thing I just thought of.

    I have my blog, but I have not given my family the address.

    I *might* set up a separate blog, flickr account, or something that is family only.

    I prefer to keep the two worlds a bit more separate. :)

Leave a Reply