<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remove link grants license to send spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://galaxycow.com/blogs/vermyndax/2008/07/05/remove-link-grants-license-to-send-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://galaxycow.com/blogs/vermyndax/2008/07/05/remove-link-grants-license-to-send-spam/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t let serenity fool you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 26700midgets</title>
		<link>http://galaxycow.com/blogs/vermyndax/2008/07/05/remove-link-grants-license-to-send-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>26700midgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galaxycow.com/blogs/vermyndax/?p=390#comment-241</guid>
		<description>So what you are really saying is that you have so little to do that you are nit picking what is an obvious typo?

First off cybermage

it clearly shows privacy(at) not privacy@

second:

the http:// is obvious and most intelligent people will see that and remove it

third:

looks to me like their server just has a script wrong. FAR from such an attempt to make it a fake url. I dont personally see anything amiss in their privacy policy.

For can-spam compliance that email had to have both a physical opt-out address and at least 1 opt-out link for both the advertiser and the mailer IN THE BODY of the message (privacy policy doesnt count)

Of course if you click their Non-opt out links it re-confirms you, after all YOU are CLICKING the links. It would really help if you looked at what you were clicking before you just click it.

So with that in mind, you must have opt-in to begin with or you would not have ended up on their list. If you did not then ask them to provide opt-in info, i got email from that domain in June/July as well and you know what.... My opt-in info was CLEARLY IN THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE.

Please post more articles like showing how little attention you pay to things before you go &quot;internet whining&quot;.

We have enough spam mail without crappy spam blogs too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you are really saying is that you have so little to do that you are nit picking what is an obvious typo?</p>
<p>First off cybermage</p>
<p>it clearly shows privacy(at) not privacy@</p>
<p>second:</p>
<p>the <a href='http://' rel='nofollow'>http://</a> is obvious and most intelligent people will see that and remove it</p>
<p>third:</p>
<p>looks to me like their server just has a script wrong. FAR from such an attempt to make it a fake url. I dont personally see anything amiss in their privacy policy.</p>
<p>For can-spam compliance that email had to have both a physical opt-out address and at least 1 opt-out link for both the advertiser and the mailer IN THE BODY of the message (privacy policy doesnt count)</p>
<p>Of course if you click their Non-opt out links it re-confirms you, after all YOU are CLICKING the links. It would really help if you looked at what you were clicking before you just click it.</p>
<p>So with that in mind, you must have opt-in to begin with or you would not have ended up on their list. If you did not then ask them to provide opt-in info, i got email from that domain in June/July as well and you know what&#8230;. My opt-in info was CLEARLY IN THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE.</p>
<p>Please post more articles like showing how little attention you pay to things before you go &#8220;internet whining&#8221;.</p>
<p>We have enough spam mail without crappy spam blogs too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cybermage</title>
		<link>http://galaxycow.com/blogs/vermyndax/2008/07/05/remove-link-grants-license-to-send-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>cybermage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galaxycow.com/blogs/vermyndax/?p=390#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Check out the email address they give as well... I&#039;m thinking it won&#039;t work ;-)

privacy@http://istevedaily.com  doesn&#039;t quite look like a properly formatted email address somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the email address they give as well&#8230; I&#8217;m thinking it won&#8217;t work <img src='http://galaxycow.com/blogs/vermyndax/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="mailto:privacy@http://istevedaily.com">privacy@http://istevedaily.com</a>  doesn&#8217;t quite look like a properly formatted email address somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

